<div class="image-550">
<img src="https://cdn.kahimyang.com/resources-22/president-marcos-jr.avif" alt="Ferdinand Marcos Jr." loading="lazy" />
<div>
(President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.)
</div>
</div>
<p>
This is according to the transcript released by the Chinese Embassy in Manila of a purported conversation in November last year between an identified Chinese diplomat and Armed Forces Western Command (WESCOM) head Alberto Carlos expounding on the "new model" which he said had been approved by Marcos, Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Chief Romeo Brawner, Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro and National Security Adviser Eduardo Año.
</p>
<p>
For months, Marcos' defense secretary, his national security adviser, even the foreign affairs secretary, kept denying there was an agreement, with even a low-ranking official, the Philippine Coast Guard's talkative spokesman, Jay Tarriela, calling the Chinese "constant liars."
</p>
<h4>
ASAP
</h4>
<p>
These officials should resign ASAP: How can they have the gall to stick to their posts when they have been exposed either as liars - they knew there was an agreement but insisted there wasn't - or they are officials in crucial posts whom Marcos didn't trust to tell them that there was a pact.
</p>


<p>
This is mind-boggling: Instead of denying that the President had approved of the "new model," Defense Secretary Gilberto "Gibo" Teodoro Jr. admitted he had not been told about it by Marcos and declared that the Chinese had violated the country's Anti-Wiretapping Law. In the next sentence though, he claimed the taped conversation was fake. With such bad blood now between Teodoro and the Chinese, how can he now meet Chinese diplomats to discuss many, many military-related things involving his country and China. Our defense secretary can no longer talk to the second most powerful military in the world.
</p>
<p>
Teodoro also said that only the President "and nobody else" could enter into an agreement on the West Philippines Sea. Isn't it obvious that it was Marcos, as commander in chief, who ordered WESCOM head Carlos to enter into the agreement?
</p>
<p>
While the transcript did not categorically say that Marcos authorized or ordered the Navy's adoption of the "new model," Carlos, a much-respected Navy official with the rank of vice admiral, could not have usurped the President's powers, especially one involving our foreign relations. If he did not get the President's authority, he could be court-martialed for usurpation of authority, a grave offense that could get him discharged from the service, thrown in jail and lose all retirement benefits.
</p>
<h4>
Transcript
</h4>
<p>
The transcript the Chinese Embassy released had this statement by the Chinese diplomat: "Last of course, this proposal has been approved by [redacted], General Brawner, Secretary Gibo and Secretary Año." The redacted part (see image) could only contain Marcos' name. Even the redacted space could have been filled up only by "President Ferdinand Marcos Jr."
</p>
<div class="image-full-width">
<img src="https://cdn.kahimyang.com/resources-22/ph-china-agreement.avif" alt="Philippine China agreement on South China Sea" loading="lazy" />
<div>
(Transcript of the alleged conversation released by the Chinese Embassy (boxed Marcos name added by Rigoberto D. Tiglao). The Manila Times photo)
</div>
</div>
<p>
<i>As of the deadline for this column's submission</i>, Marcos has not replied to the Chinese Embassy's earth-shaking revelations. WESCOM head Carlos was relieved of his command the day the embassy released the transcript. He could not be reached by media such that his comrades in the military have reportedly started to get worried. Carlos has had a distinguished career in the Navy and headed the Navy's Philippine Fleet or the second component in its organization, the other being the Marines. Filipinos deserve to know if the conversation between him and the Chinese diplomat on the "new model" is accurate or not.
</p>
<p>
The Foreign Affairs Department issued a totally inane statement: 
</p>
<div class="article-comment">
<p>
"The DFA (Department of Foreign Affairs) cautions Filipinos against falling for false narratives. Resorting to tactics such as releasing unverifiable recordings of supposed conversations with Philippine officials could demonstrate efforts to sow discord and confusion among Philippine agencies and the Filipino public."
</p>
</div>
<p>
How can the DFA claim the transcript presented false narratives, when it was not a party to the approval of the "new model" by Marcos, which it shouldn't be since the DFA is not involved in military affairs? Yet its statement was revealing in that it has "confused government agencies" referring really to itself, which has been claiming that there was "no Cabinet-level official" that approved the new model. That's true, it was the President himself who approved it.
</p>
<h4>
New model
</h4>
<p>
Referred to as a "new model," the agreement concerns how the Philippines would go about supplying the Sierra Madre, stuck 200 kilometers away from Palawan, with a squad of Marines guarding it from pirates. However, there are only two "new" elements in the agreement, since successive administrations since President Joseph Estrada - including that of Benigno Aquino III - implemented a pact by which the Philippines had been sending only transport, food and water or humanitarian subsistence and not repair or construction materials that would have made the decrepit vessel a permanent Philippine outpost. The "new model," however, specifies the number of vessels (one coast guard and one civilian vessel for each country) that would participate in the resupply mission, and the Chinese would be given two days' notice before it is undertaken.
</p>
<p>
Yet Marcos, a few months ago, declared haughtily that if there was such an agreement, he was "rescinding it." Then just last month, he said he was "horrified" that his predecessor, Rodrigo Duterte, had been implementing that agreement, first made in 2009. How could he forget that he authorized the Navy in January this year to follow the agreement? What is he taking?
</p>


What a President: He's made us, again, the world's laughingstock